Leeds: Graham Smyth drops Joe Gelhardt contract update

Leeds United correspondent Graham Smyth has revealed that the club are in ‘advanced talks’ with Joe Gelhardt over a new deal.

The Lowdown: Gelhardt at Leeds

The Whites brought Gelhardt to Elland Road back in 2020 from Wigan Athletic for just £900,000. Since then, the 20-year-old has gone from strength to strength at Thorp Arch, contributing to 24 goals in 28 games for the U23s. He also enjoyed a breakthrough year in the first team during the previous campaign, making 20 appearances.

Gelhardt played his part in helping Leeds avoid relegation with a dramatic late winner against Norwich and a sublime assist in stoppage time against Brighton, which resulted in Alan Hutton labelling the forward as ‘unreal’.

The Latest: Smyth’s update

Smyth took to Twitter on Thursday evening to reveal that Leeds are in ‘advanced talks’ with Gelhardt over a new long-term deal.

The Yorkshire Evening Post reporter added that Gelhardt is set to be ‘the first of several to enter contract discussions’.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-leeds-united-updates-5/” title=”Latest Leeds United updates!” poster=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cropped-2022-03-10T184055Z_1834933207_UP1EI3A1FW561_RTRMADP_3_SOCCER-ENGLAND-LEE-AVA-REPORT-1-scaled-1.jpg” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The Verdict: Good news

Gelhardt’s impressive displays didn’t just catch the eye at Elland Road, with the youngster recently nominated for the 2022 Golden Boy award.

His current deal has just two years left to run, so now is the perfect time for a well-earned extension. Gelhardt proved he can step up to the demands of the Premier League, so he could be in line to feature more regularly from the off as a result under Jesse Marsch.

Hopefully, talks can be finalised over the coming days and Leeds can announce a new deal next week, as Smyth states could happen.

Leeds: Worrying Phillips transfer news

Leeds United are bracing themselves for the departure of Kalvin Phillips during the summer transfer window, according to The Athletic. 

The lowdown

Leeds midfielder Phillips is attracting interest from some of the top sides in the country.

Premier League champions Manchester City have reportedly identified him as their primary target to replace the departing Fernandinho. Runners-up Liverpool, meanwhile, are also said to be eyeing the 26-year-old.

And Manchester United are even supposedly ‘working on a deal’ too, having picked out Phillips as a cheaper alternative to West Ham’s Declan Rice.

The Englishman has two years left to run on his contract at Jesse Marsch’s side, but no significant progress has been made towards an extension.

The latest

Writing in a mailbag piece, journalist Laurie Whitwell shared insight from figures close to Leeds – ‘sources say’ Leeds are increasingly resigned to losing Phillips in the next couple of months.

There is, at least, a ‘strong sense’ that a move to ‘bitter rivals’ Man. United is off the table.

Phillips apparently knows that making the switch could effectively ruin his reputation at Elland Road.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-leeds-united-updates-4/” title=”Latest Leeds United updates!” poster=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cropped-2022-03-10T184055Z_1834933207_UP1EI3A1FW561_RTRMADP_3_SOCCER-ENGLAND-LEE-AVA-REPORT-1-scaled-1.jpg” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The verdict

This is worrying for Leeds fans given Phillips’ importance to the side.

Last season may have been heavily disrupted by injury, but he started all but five games when he was fit and available.

Marsch says it was clear from the moment he arrived that Phillips has a positive ‘effect on the group’ because of ‘his personality, his quality [and] what he means to being part of Leeds United’.

And the club’s supporters voted him their second-best player of 2021, only behind Raphinha.

The reality is that Phillips, England’s reigning Player of the Year, may want to be playing European football, rather than battling for survival as he did with Leeds last season.

The challenge for Leeds now is to extract the maximum price tag – they apparently want £60million – and to nail the replacement. Work is already underway, with Marc Roca of Bayern Munich identified as a possible successor.

In other news, read this expert’s reaction to two big Leeds transfer developments.

Tottenham: Journalist lifts lid on Nunez transfer meeting

According to reporter Jacque Talbot of Football Transfers, a significant Tottenham Hotspur transfer development has now come to light involving Benfica star Darwin Nunez.

The Lowdown: Spurs set for busy summer?

Lilywhites boss Antonio Conte has now met with club chief Fabio Paratici in Italy as Spurs map out a list of summer targets (The Telegraph).

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/tottenham-latest-developments-2/” title=”Tottenham latest developments!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

This comes after Premier League giants confirmed a £150 million capital increase which could seriously back Conte in the next transfer wind0w ahead of his first full season in charge.

On the transfer agenda, it is believed that the north Londoners are interested in landing an alternative frontman to star striker Harry Kane, with Talbot now sharing a significant update involving Nunez.

The Latest: Nunez meeting held…

According to the reporter, writing for Football Transfers, Spurs and representatives of the in-demand striker have held a meeting as they enter talks – though it is currently unclear whether Paratici and co wish to move further with a formal bid.

This comes as Tottenham, via Talbot, do ‘want to bring in a marquee striker’ for Conte.

The Verdict: Make the move…

As the north Londoners currently weigh pushing further, there is little denying that Nunez would add seriously quality going by his huge goal haul over 2021/2022 – not to mention the fact he has been labelled an ‘absolute beast’ by members of the media (Hari Sethi, Anfield Index Podcaster).

However, reports he could cost around £100 million could be a real deterrent for Spurs even despite their recent cash injection.

Tottenham and Paratici have to strengthen in other areas as Conte reportedly sets his sights on a major overhaul, so we believe the club should look at potentially cheaper alternatives first before deciding to press further for Nunez.

In other news: ‘Not only Perisic’ – Tottenham push for ‘genius’ signing after Conte call ‘in recent days’…find out more here.

Leeds: Whelan urges Marsch to keep tactics

Former Leeds United striker Noel Whelan has urged manager Jesse Marsch to stick with a new-look back five for the upcoming Premier League clashes with Chelsea and Arsenal. 

The lowdown: Difficult test for Leeds

The Whites were well beaten by a rampant Manchester City at Elland Road at the weekend when utilising a new system, despite competing with the title-chasers for large parts of the match.

That defeat leaves the Yorkshire club just two points clear of the relegation zone, having played one game more than Everton in 18th.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-leeds-united-updates-2/” title=”Latest Leeds United updates!” poster=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cropped-2022-03-10T184055Z_1834933207_UP1EI3A1FW561_RTRMADP_3_SOCCER-ENGLAND-LEE-AVA-REPORT-1-scaled-1.jpg” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

Despite the damaging result, Marsch has been urged to stick with the tactical tweak as Leeds prepare for an all-important double-header in their quest to survive in the top flight.

The latest: Whelan endorses back five

Speaking to Football Insider, former Whites attacker Whelan – who is now an employee of the club – has had his say on the formation, believing that it is worth persevering with.

He stated: “I think we need to respect what Arsenal and Chelsea have. I think the five at the back experiment worked for much of the Man City game. We were simply outdone by a team who have far more quality than we do. Against good teams, you get punished – just as City did.

“But looking at the whole game, there were positives to take. We’re going to have to be a solid defensive unit, but also pick our moments going forward as well. You can’t just absorb pressure for 90 minutes.

“We’ve got to ask questions of Chelsea and Arsenal. I liked the five-man system, both offensively and defensively. We got into the 5-4-1 shape really effectively when we lost the ball – and you’ve got to do that to prevent space opening up between the lines.”

The verdict: Needs must

Marsch certainly hasn’t shirked the battle facing Leeds since arriving at the club, and the American – who has historically implemented a 4-2-2-2 formation –  has already shown a willingness to adapt to circumstances during his fledgling tenure at Elland Road.

However, the Whites have kept just five clean sheets in 34 matches so far this season, the second-fewest in the top flight after 19th-placed Watford.

That inability to keep opponents at bay has ultimately left Leeds in their precarious situation, and having had more time to work on the new system at Thorp Arch this week in preparation for the meeting with Arsenal on Sunday, Marsch should indeed stick with his guns.

In light of the injuries suffered by Liam Cooper and Stuart Dallas, Spanish ace Diego Llorente and 19-year-old defender Charlie Cresswell could be called into the team to make up the defensive unit.

In other news: Journalist makes claim involving Leeds United star…find out more here

Infamy, redemption entwine for Smith and Warner

Even as a reckoning awaits CA and the Australian team on the culture front, public opinion of the banned players have already softened

Daniel Brettig22-May-2018Paul Kelly’s plaintive wish for redemption, , could almost have been written for Steven Smith, David Warner and Cameron Bancroft.Whether in Cape Town, Perth or Sydney, all carried the heavy weight of the Newlands ball-tampering scandal, with a governing body in Cricket Australia all too eager to turn the screw on the trio in order to contain any wider damage to the game in the weeks before signing a new broadcast rights deal. “They haven’t been charged by Cricket Australia for ball tampering,” the board’s chief executive James Sutherland said. “It relates to contrary to the spirit of the game, it relates to denigrating the game or having an impact on the reputation and image of the game, causing damage to the game, all of those things have quite clearly happened in a short space of time as a result of those actions.”Smith, Warner in Fame top 10

Famous or infamous? The question hangs in the air above Steven Smith and David Warner as they both make ESPN Australia’s fame top 10 in the wake of a year that featured the Newlands ball-tampering scandal but also the regaining of the Ashes at home. Both will be eligible by the time the national team begins preparing for the 2019 Ashes and World Cup double; the question is whether Australian cricket will still be as needy for their talents as would appear the case right now.

Smith’s two airport tableaux, manhandled through O.R. Tambo International Airport in South Africa, then crying his eyes out at Kingsford Smith in Sydney, could not cease to stir the emotions of even the most cynical observer. If Warner’s visage attracted less sympathy, his words were more definitively bleak. “In the back of my mind I suppose there is a tiny ray of hope,” Warner said, “that I may one day be given the privilege of playing for my country again, but I am resigned to the fact that that may never happen.”Their actions at Newlands, as defined by CA’s comprehensive code of conduct charge sheet, were indefensible. Bancroft received some measure of leniency on account of his inexperience, but there was no such consideration for Smith and Warner. In a trice, Australia’s two best and most prominent cricketers were cast out of the game, with many more ramifications to follow CA’s judgment. First, a matter of hours after being handed their CA bans, they were culled from this year’s IPL. Sponsors deserted them, and fans both at home and abroad expressed their outrage in terms that grew increasingly shrill.Amid the public maelstrom and their private senses of turmoil, all pondered whether or not to take their CA charges and penalties to code of conduct hearings. Each player had grounds for doing so, and it may be a long time before further details of exactly what took place at Newlands, before and after Bancroft was seen roughing up the ball before trying to hide sandpaper down his trousers, emerge. But one by one, all chose to waive their right to this process, accepting the “umpire’s” verdict, however harsh it seemed, to allow the healing of their reputations to begin.Right now, a little less than two months later, much has already changed for Smith and Warner. They have returned, carefully, to the public eye – Smith announcing his arrival back home in Australia after a trip to the United States, Warner turning up doing community work in the Northern Territory. They are being offered all manner of opportunities to make their returns to the game, beyond the bounds of the ban on international and first-class cricket imposed on them by CA. And the public rhetoric around them has softened noticeably, a process that began when the national team coach Darren Lehmann resigned upon witnessing Smith’s tearful return home.In recent weeks, Lehmann’s successor Justin Langer has increased the level of verbal compassion, speaking of the Cape Town trio in terms of mistakes and learning. “They’ve made mistakes. We have all made mistakes and we can all get better,” he said. “David Warner made a mistake. Has he got areas to get better at? Yes. Has Steve Smith? Has Cameron Bancroft? Has every single person in Australian cricket? Yes. They have all got areas in we keep helping and mentoring them and if they meet the standards of the Australian cricket team, of course, they will be welcomed back.”Similar noises have emanated from Tim Paine, the man thrust into the captaincy. In a recent interview with , he even stated that the Australian team he now leads is still Smith and Warner’s – he is merely keeping the seat warm. “Once they’ve served their sanctions they’ll be welcomed back into our team with no issues whatsoever,” Paine said. “Everyone wants to move past South Africa. In a way, I see it as their team, and I want to do the right thing by them, but I also want to move our culture and behaviour forward and I want them to be part of it.”Sport, of course, is replete with stories of redemption. Google “sporting redemption” and click through any one of 459,000 results to see it. The comeback narrative is so deeply entrenched in sporting lore that it would feel oddly incomplete without such tales, whether they are played out to a glorious conclusion in the manner of the Boston Red Sox and Chicago Cubs breaking their long droughts without ultimate baseball success, or left hanging on the many what-ifs of, say, Greg Norman at the Masters. This sense of desire for a happy ending is key to understanding how Smith and Warner may yet find themselves back on the dais of cricketing success, surrounded by teammates who, in the horrid days immediately after the Newlands Test, found themselves very much at odds with Warner in particular.But there is also a pragmatic element to much of the warming rhetoric and sense of change. CA, having pushed the issue from bad publicity to investigation, charge and acceptance of sanctions in little more than two weeks – compare that to the Essendon AFL drugs scandal which dragged on for years – wants a rejuvenated image for the game and the national team. The sport’s new Australian broadcasters, and , want viewers in their many hundreds of thousands, and the strong returns of Warner and Smith can only add to those figures. Fox’s part owners at News Corporation want to sell newspapers and digital subscriptions, something far more likely to happen as followers are drawn into the long road back for the former captain and his deputy. And supporters of the game wish to feel good about it again, after all the opprobrium of March and April.A reckoning still awaits CA and the national team, in terms of the way the organisation has been run in recent times, and the way in which the men clad in the baggy green had built up plenty of ill will among opponents over numerous years of caustic behaviour on the field. Both elements are the subject of separate reviews, expected to report back to CA before the start of next summer. With questions having already been asked about the links between CA and both organisations carrying out these reviews, the release of any kind of “whitewash” style findings would likely send the board back into the realms of disrepute, even as Warner and Smith slowly return to the game after serving their punishments.What’s likely, however, is that Smith and Warner find themselves welcomed back into the fold, if for no other reason than the fact that Australia’s cricket team will struggle to secure the desired results – overseas in particular – without the runs they can provide. When their playing bans expire in March 2019, it will be a matter of weeks before the start of the 50-over World Cup, and a matter of months before the Ashes tour that follows it. These assignments loom as the moments when, unlike the forlorn figure in Kelly’s song, Smith and Warner will get their chance to start today again.

Kohli undone by Wagner's angles

An analytical look at deliveries that highlighted vital aspects of a hard-fought day of Test cricket in Kanpur

Aakash Chopra22-Sep-20160.1 – Revealing the plan
Only two slips and a gully. One catcher at short midwicket. No one at point. Not the usual field for the first ball of a Test. Trent Boult not only shows his hand – the ball is going to be within the stumps – but also New Zealand’s assessment of the pitch. The first ball to KL Rahul slips down the leg side and barely carries to the wicketkeeper. Batsmen won’t be blamed if they commit to the front foot a little early. Once in a while, a bouncer won’t be a bad choice.Fourth over – How to play the short ball
Neil Wagner starts with the first attempted bouncer of the Test, to which M Vijay shoulders arms. He takes it on the arm guard and the message is plain. Ducking won’t be an option to deal with bouncers on this surface. Need to stay side-on, for that will make the target smaller, and stay upright, for that will allow the batsman to ride the bounce. Also, be prepared to take a few blows on the body while keeping eyes on the ball and dropping the wrists. Vijay’s response to the first ball encourages Wagner to send down five more consecutive short deliveries.5.4 – The leg-side snare
Second slip is out. Only first slip and a gully in the sixth over of the Test. There’s a fielder at deep square leg and short midwicket. Classic cat-and-mouse game. Expect a bouncer, but not just the bouncer because the fielder at short midwicket means the batsman must flick fuller ones carefully. Both left-arm seamers have gone around the stumps. It allows them not only to bowl a wicket-to-wicket line but keeps the area Ashwin would like to exploit undamaged.Mitchell Santner took a while to find his length on this pitch, but when he did he began to cause problems•BCCI10.6 – Length is mandatory
An attempted arm ball from Mitchell Santner grips the pitch, takes out a little piece of the surface, and spins to find Rahul’s outside edge. Bowling a little quicker in the air is the formula on this slow-low Kanpur pitch but it’s critical to find the right length to create doubt. Until this ball, Santner was guilty of bowling a bit too full. Ravindra Jadeja must already be licking his fingers. For the batsmen, picking the spinners’ length early is going to be key to run-making. While they can make up for an error in judgment of length against pace, it will get increasingly difficult to succeed if they misread length against spin.26.6 – Nimble feet against spin
Cheteshwar Pujara goes down the pitch and plays against Ish Sodhi’s legspin to the left of Boult at mid-on. This is the Pujara of old, someone who picks the length early and uses his feet to either go deep into the crease to cut or pull, or get to the pitch of the ball by stepping out. While Sodhi isn’t a big turner of the ball, he bowls reasonably quick in the air to discourage batsmen from coming down the pitch, and so this boundary by Pujara is a significant indicator of his form and mindset – considerably more positive than it has been in the recent past.51.1 and 51.3 – The importance of angles
Wagner bowls a short ball from around the stumps, Kohli helps it on its way to the fine-leg boundary. Next ball, Wagner goes over the stumps and bowls another short delivery. This time Kohli top-edges the pull to Sodhi at fine leg. Two similar balls produce two radically different results: it was down to the angles. When Wagner bowled around the stumps, the angle took the ball into Kohli’s body and it was a easier to guide the delivery to fine leg. But the moment Wagner went over the stumps, the angle took the ball away from Kohli and that led to a lack of control while playing the same shot.Trent Boult shortened his length late in the day, and bowled Wriddhiman Saha with one that nipped back late•BCCI56th to 76th over – Missing Santner
Santner has been New Zealand’s most successful bowler but he does not bowl for a period of 20 overs when India are in a precarious situation. The fall of Ajinkya Rahane gave New Zealand a window to get into India’s tail. Santner’s absence allows R Ashwin and Rohit Sharma to settle. They face him only after they have played over 50 balls each and the threat wasn’t the same. Williamson waits for the second new ball to bring Santner back, and it immediately results in Rohit’s wicket, but the delay might have cost New Zealand crucial time and runs.Boult gets it right
Chatting with Zaheer Khan during commentary made me realise the importance of a fast bowler finding the right length in the subcontinent. Boult was too full with the first new ball and that enabled Vijay and Rahul to negate him. But he pulled back his length with the second new ball and found movement off the pitch. It isn’t just batsmen who take time to adjust to different conditions. Bowlers do too.

Babylonian or Greek: what's your pick?

Richard Feynman, the American physicist, distinguished mathematical tradition based on the Babylonian and Greek ways of thinking. His reasoning could apply to batting styles too

Vijay Subramanya17-Aug-2015Simon Barnes’ beautiful piece in the August issue of The Cricket Monthly on the constant debate surrounding the two kinds of batsmen — artists and artisans, as he calls them — reminded me of a similar distinction that Richard Feynman, the great American physicist, often invoked. Of course, Feynman was concerned more with mathematical tradition than with batting styles, but it is not hard to see remarkable parallels between the two debates.Feynman distinguished between the Babylonian and the Greek ways of mathematical thinking. The Babylonians discovered independent truths, often by relying on observation. The Greeks, on the other hand, looked to build a body of mathematics from a set of fundamental axioms. Babylonians employed instinct and intuition, while the Greeks, as Feynman says, “brought the full force of logical machinery to fit their ideas into a greater logical system”. If batting were mathematics, then Kevin Pietersen would be a Babylonian and Alastair Cook probably a Greek.If you approve of the above analogy, then the minute you ask whether the artist is morally superior to the artisan, you will agree with what Barnes rightly concludes: Morality is irrelevant here. As long as mathematicians discover new insights without stealing ideas, they are morally right, regardless of which school they belong to. In the context of cricket, neither Pietersen nor Cook is morally superior to the other.However, the analogy goes only so far, coming to a grinding halt when we see that mathematical ideas can possess inherent beauty whereas batting scores are lifeless, which places greater weight on batting styles. If we acknowledge that a fraction of the paying public cares as much about the way of run-making as they do about the final scores, then it is clear that a fraction of players’ bank deposits are due to a style of play expected from them. This is not to say that Cook should turn a Babylonian or Pietersen a Greek; perhaps they are physically or mentally incapable of doing that. There is a more subtle moral issue at hand.The cause of injustice is the bias selectors traditionally have had against the Babylonians and toward the Greeks. The fall guy in any failed campaign tends to be a Babylonian — ask David Gower, VVS Laxman, or Pietersen — although some, like Rohit Sharma and Shahid Afridi, have benefited from being one. This means the Greek section of the crowd is more likely to get their money’s worth, and the Greek batsman who pockets Babylonian coins is more likely to stay in the team. Add to that the fact that Babylonian fans are far greater in number (going by the number of views Pietersen’s innings garner on YouTube) and the balance tilts further away from them.Of course, none of this applies to the truly great batsmen. Feynman firmly believed that physics must be approached the Babylonian way, but conceded that the Greek method had its role in mathematics. The best kind of mathematician builds theories brick by brick but, at the same time, is intuitive. So it is with the batting masters. By combining the best of the two schools, they elevate batting, or the pursuit of runs, to batsmanship, an art.In that perfect balance lies the beauty. To me, the closest to come to achieving that in recent years was Sachin Tendulkar, whom Sir Viv Richards once described as “God” where batsmanship is concerned. It feels serendipitous that he sits at the top of run charts. I want Tendulkar’s records to stay unblemished for more or less the same reason I want Goldbach’s conjecture, a paragon of mathematical beauty, to be proved true. Well, at least until someone more balanced than Tendulkar comes along. Unfortunately, Cook does not seem to fit the bill.If you have a submission for Inbox, send it to us here, with “Inbox” in the subject line.

Power, pace and spin: the team of the tournament

ESPNcricinfo writers select their team of the tournament from the World T20

Andrew McGlashan07-Apr-2014Virat Kohli’s run tally was the highest for a batsman in a World T20•ICCStephan Myburgh (7 matches, 224 runs @ 32.00, S/R 154.48)The attacking left hander often provided the impetus for Netherland’s innings. He began the tournament with 55 off 36 balls and then inspired the fantastic pursuit against Ireland when they hunted down the target in quick enough time to enter the Super 10s. In terms of opposition, though, his best innings was the 51 off 28 deliveries against South Africa where he set his team up for a famous victory only for the lower order to blow it.Alex Hales (4 matches, 166 runs @ 55,33, S/R 158.09)In on the strength of one innings – but what an innings it was. The 116 off 64 balls against Sri Lanka was England’s first international T20 hundred and led them to their highest successful chance. For one day (and that’s about as long as it lasted) it lifted the cloud hanging over English cricket.Virat Kohli (6 matches, 319 runs @ 106.33, S/R 129.14)The Player of the Tournament, of that there was no doubt. Can rightly win an argument over who is the best batsman in the world right now. His innings against South Africa in the semi-final was as perfect as you could wish to see in a pressurised T20 chase. His consistency – across six innings his lowest score was 23 – meant that India were rarely in trouble; his innings in the final scotched any notion about batting first being an issue. You could feel his frustration as he lost the strike in the closing overs.Glenn Maxwell (4 matches, 147 runs @ 36.75, S/R 210.00)
Australia’s reputation at World T20s continued to flounder, but Maxwell enhanced – or at least cemented – his with a searing strike-rate. His 74 off 33 was a ferocious innings from where Australia should have beaten Pakistan. Once viewed as a raw slogger, Maxwell is a dynamic, calculating T20 batsman who backs himself to the hilt.JP Duminy (5 matches, 187 runs @ 62.33, S/R 140.60)
His unbeaten 86 against New Zealand was one of two performances which kept South Africa in the tournament, and he finished as their leading run-scorer. Also hit the most sixes among South Africa’s batsmen (eight, the next most was three). His offspin was expensive – conceding more than nine an over – but given the difficulties spinners had in Chittagong, it was felt better to try and squeeze an early over out of him.Power at the death: few targets are out of reach when Darren Sammy is at the crease•Getty ImagesDarren Sammy (5 matches, 101 runs @ 101.00, S/R 224.44)
Now one of the finest finishers in this format. The power he gets into his shots is phenomenal and he can turn a half-decent delivery into a six. He produced two startling innings in different situations: the unbeaten 34 against Australia to seal a highly-charged chase and his unbeaten 42 to turn a poor total into a match-winning one against Pakistan. West Indies were well adrift in their semi-final against Sri Lanka, but it would not have been beyond Sammy to turn it around. He would also be an inspirational captain for this team.Denesh Ramdin (5 matches, 6 stumpings)
Barely had a chance to influence a match with the bat, but his glovework was as consistent and sharp as he has ever shown on the international stage. Standing up to Krishmar Santokie with the new ball helped suffocate batsmen and he was alert whenever Samuel Badree or Sunil Narine zipped one past the outside edge. Quirkily, all his dismissals were stumpings.R Ashwin (6 matches, 11 wickets @ 11.27, Econ 5.35)
Arguably bowler of the tournament as he combined wickets with economy. He conceded just 5.35 per over across six matches – only in the final going for more than a run-a-ball – and also produced the ball of the tournament to remove Hashim Amla in the semi-final. His round-the-wicket line and shrewd use of the carrom ball left many batsmen fumbling. That he did not have enough runs to work with in the final was not his faultDale Steyn (5 matches, 9 wickets @ 17.00, Econ 7.98)
The dirty overs were rarely much muckier than when Steyn was thrown the ball by AB de Villiers or Faf du Plessis which explains the high economy. At times, South Africa’s entire hopes rested on his shoulders – in the Super 10 match against New Zealand he responded with one of the finest final overs in T20 history as he defended a paltry seven runs. In the semi-final, all of South Africa’s eggs were in Steyn’s basket, almost an unfair expectation against India, and he could not quite find the perfection required.Imran Tahir showed the value of attacking with the ball•AFPImran Tahir (5 matches, 12 wickets @ 10.91, Econ 6.55)
In the not too distant past you would have got long odds on a legspinner being central to a South African bowling attack in any format – let alone T20. But the shifting balance of risk and reward, with some captains now putting the value of wickets above the cost of an extra six or two, was clearly shown in Tahir’s role. It helped him that three of the group stage opponents – New Zealand, England and Netherlands – were among the weakest at playing spin, but he also claimed 3 for 26 against the nimble-footed Sri Lankans.Lasith Malinga (6 matches, 5 wickets @ 22.00, Econ 6.11)
When it really mattered, Malinga came to the fore and that is the mark of a star player. In the semi-final, with West Indies threatening to break away early in their chase, he removed both openers in a two-over spell that cost just five runs. Then, in the final, which brought with it an airplane load of baggage for Sri Lanka, he delivered one of the finest death spells you will see to limit the previously untroubled Indian batting order to scampering singles.The 2nd XI Rohit Sharma, Kane Williamson, Mahela Jayawardene, Tom Cooper, AB de Villiers, Angelo Mathews, MS Dhoni (capt & wk), Nuwan Kulasekara, Samuel Badree, Krishmar Santokie, Amit Mishra

Rohit begins to clear his debts

Abhishek Purohit in Colombo19-Sep-2012Less than two months ago, Rohit Sharma stood halfway between the dressing room and the pitch at the R Premadasa Stadium in Colombo after being dismissed leg-before, hoping the third umpire would find that Nuwan Pradeep had overstepped. When the on-field umpire raised the finger a second time, Rohit closed his eyes in anguish and turned back, his languid gait reduced to a heavy-hearted plod, knowing he had heaped more pressure on himself after his fourth successive single-digit score.On Tuesday, after successive scores of 37 and 56 in the World Twenty20 warm-up games against Sri Lanka and Pakistan, Rohit walked calmly into the media-briefing room at the same Premadasa and fielded questions confidently.He began by thanking the team management for backing him throughout his unproductive run: “Talking about the past Sri Lanka tour, it was frustrating. I was not in great form but everyone showed faith in me, which is very encouraging. I have certainly worked hard on my batting and my fitness as well, so I think it is showing.”The management had gone out of their way to support someone who has been the future of Indian batting for five years now. With calls for dropping Rohit getting shriller after every failure of his, they ended the debate for the moment by leaving out legspinner Rahul Sharma to give the long-benched Manoj Tiwary a few games. But Rohit’s woes worsened as he ended the tour with a miserable run of 5, 0, 0, 4 and 4.Towards the end of the trip, you could see what a toll it was taking on him. Having the management’s faith is fine, but that’s also like a loan until you repay it with runs. Rohit’s drooped shoulders carried themselves even into football games during practice. He would trudge around in the team hotel with the lack of runs clearly evident in his morose expression. It wasn’t as if he had embraced sadness. He was making an effort to enjoy the football games, he was making an effort to smile at acquaintances, but the load of non-performance, it appeared, was becoming too heavy to bear.Rohit probably needed to be away from a match situation for some time, because it appeared as if he was just trying to somehow not get dismissed. “After the Sri Lanka tour, I got 20-25 days and I made full use of it,” Rohit said. “I was practicing at BKC indoors [at the Mumbai Cricket Association’s academy] and I also went to the National Cricket Academy for a while. The hard work never stops. Whether you are in-form or not in-form you just have to keep working hard, which I have been doing.”The Sri Lanka tour cost Rohit his place in the Test squad against New Zealand. He was selected for the World Twenty20 but there was little chance he was going to be an asset with his form and mindset at that time. Rohit needed runs, but he didn’t get a chance to bat much in the T20Is against Sri Lanka in August and New Zealand in September.

Having the management’s faith is fine, but that’s also like a loan until you repay it with runs. [During his poor run] Rohit’s drooped shoulders carried themselves even into football games during practice. He was making an effort to enjoy the football games, but the load of non-performance, it appeared, was becoming too heavy to bear.

Had he failed in the warm-up matches as well and still kept his place in the XI against Afghanistan, the team management’s confidence in him would have started to resemble blind faith. Fortunately for them, and Rohit, he managed to take advantage of the relatively pressure-free environment of the warm-ups to make two decent scores, his 37 against Sri Lanka coming after India were reduced to 51 for 4. Against Pakistan, with the in-form Virat Kohli charging out almost every ball to the spinners, Rohit did well not to follow his partner’s approach, and waited in the crease for loose deliveries. He still finished on 56 at a strike-rate of 140.Rohit acknowledged the importance of the two matches. “These two warm-up games, I wanted to make full use of because getting into a tournament with bad form is not a good way to go into a tournament. Even in Chennai [where] we played against New Zealand, I didn’t get to bat. So these two warm-up games were very important from a personal point of view and I am glad I made full use of it.”I don’t want to lose this form. I just want to bat. I don’t want to take [on] any pressure also because I just want to keep myself calm, free and composed.”Rohit’s remarks showed his relief and also the apprehension that any additional strain and this overdue arrival of runs could prove to be temporary. His mindset still appears to be a bit fragile.MS Dhoni was also asked whether he had felt relieved after Rohit got some runs, considering the extent to which he had backed his young batsman.”If you see his Twenty20 record, he has batted well, in the IPL and in the last World Twenty20 as well,” Dhoni said. “He is someone who can score big but he needs to give himself a bit more time. I felt in the two practice games he took a bit of time to get in and then played the big shots. We all know once he gets in he is someone who has the ability to play all kinds of shots and can hit all around the park.” Dhoni will be hoping Rohit uses this edition of the World Twenty20 to repay the team management’s loan of unflinching faith.

Maharoof's nightmare, and a security guard's close call

Plays of the Day for the Asia Cup final between India and Sri Lanka in Dambulla

Siddarth Ravindran in Dambulla24-Jun-2010A full house, finally</b
Crowds have been thin all tournament, but for the final fans poured into Dambulla. Deserted spots near the stadium morphed into parking lots, and Sri Lankan flags, usually prominent only near the venue, were flying most of the way from the town centre to the ground. Spectators were treated to an eclectic mix of piped music, including Punjabi, Sinhalese and hip-hop, and the bugle call that cricket appropriated from South African rugby also made a frequent appearance.Keeping it edgy
In a line-up that usually contains the unorthodox and attention-grabbing trio of Lasith Malinga, Muttiah Muralitharan and Ajantha Mendis, the less flashy line-and-length work of Nuwan Kulasekara tends to get overlooked. In the final he showed his effectiveness. After beating Dinesh Karthik and inducing an edge from him past slip in the first over, he tormented Gautam Gambhir in the third. Gambhir couldn’t get bat on ball on the stock indipper, had an overhead chance dropped at first slip next ball, before rounding off the over with a nick which the keeper, who was standing up, couldn’t hold.Eye off the ball
The number of police personnel keeping watch on the stands was double the usual due to the massive turnout for the final. These security people stand with their back to the action, and one of them was nearly injured in the line of duty when a monstrous hit for six from MS Dhoni over long-on landed just wide of her.Me, worried about the short ball?

Suresh Raina has some well-documented troubles against the bouncer. Lasith Malinga tested Raina’s technique against the short ball in the 41st over with a series of them, which the batsman survived, if awkwardly. The final delivery of the over, though, was a quick, swinging yorker and Raina was clueless against the surprise ball, getting trapped plumb in front.The glorious uncertainties
“It was one of those days when everything went right,” Farveez Maharoof said after taking his hat-trick on Tuesday. Two days later, nearly nothing did. His six overs were caned for 41 runs, including three lovely driven boundaries in four deliveries from Karthik through the off side. A difficult return chance didn’t stick in the 14th over, MS Dhoni’s punch to him at extra cover went through him and he made a hash of a simple stop at long-on when he didn’t anticipate the ball’s spin. About the only thing that went right was the straightforward catch he took to dismiss Rohit Sharma.An early breakthrough
Praveen Kumar made his name in international cricket by removing Adam Gilchrist and Ricky Ponting cheaply in both finals of the 2007-08 CB series. He repeated that trend of getting big wickets early by getting Tillakaratne Dilshan to mishit a pull to mid-on in the first over. That wicket buoyed India so much that there was applause for every small thing; for example, a regulation stop at third man by Ashish Nehra applauded by three team-mates.Some late cheer
Some of the crowd started to trickle out of the stadium once Thilina Kandamby was dismissed with Sri Lanka at a hopeless 104 for 6. Those Sri Lankan fans who stayed behind did have something to cheer when Kulasekara and Chamara Kapugedera blasted a stream of boundaries in the batting Powerplay. It didn’t threaten to change the match but at least it kept most spectators at the ground almost till the end of the match.